UT3 Updated

Welcome to interactive presentation, created with Publuu. Enjoy the reading!

50

Simultaneous lay and trench with a typical power

cable plough has been the typical cable lay

approach for most buried telecommunications

cable and now subsea power cables, mainly export

cables. This , however, could be a less practical

option when compared to pre-trenching. So says

Lee Screaton of S&A Associates.

“Simultaneous lay and trench is the process of

cable lay whereby the cable is laid into a subsea

cable plough that immediately buries the cable

into the seabed as it is towed behind the cable lay

vessel,” he said

“The problem with this method is that power

cables have a far larger diameter than telecoms

cables with a minimum bend radius (MBR) of

between 4m and 5m. Furthermore, power cables

are arguably more fragile than telecoms cables

due to the combination of large diameter, high

density and construction elements such as the

‘paper’ insulation layer.”

There are numerous advantages of simultaneous

lay and trench.

The cable is immediately trenched so

unlikely to be damaged as it waits for trenching

The whole lay and trench operation occurs

from one vessel

These advantages were, and still are, great for

tele-communications cables but they don’t

translate as well to the power cable installation

operation.

When viewed from the power cable installation

perspective, however the disadvantages are:

Power cable ploughs are larger than

telecommunications ploughs due to the far larger

MBR and usually need 150Te of bollard pull (for

2m+ trenching) making for a more powerful cable

lay vessel or dual vessel laying with an offshore tug

in tandem with the cable lay vessel

The standard approach of loading cable

into the plough on the vessel and launching with

the cable through the plough is less desirable as the

launching process can damage the cable outer

serving layer

It can be difficult to perform some

ploughing operations, such as changing heading, as

the overboard tension of a power cable should be

lower than telecoms cable due to concerns over the

fragility of the cable.

This can lead to issues such as not being able to lay

power cable directly into the bellmouth of the

plough

The back deck of a power cable lay vessel

can be congested and multi-role when compared to

a telecoms lay vessel so it isn’t easy to find space for

the power cable plough. This can lead to additional

systems such as movable mezzanine decks, etc.

Various approaches have been developed to offset

the plough related problems such as subsea loading

using grabs or ‘top loading’ techniques which avoid

the launching issues but they are not common and

have their own problems.

Is the answer to shift the emphasis to pre-trenching

instead?

In the context of this article, the term “pre-

trenching” is intended to imply the use of a plough

that creates a V shaped trench in the seabed that the

cable lay vessel lays the power cable into as a

separate process.

Practically, what this means is a pre-trenching plough

is deployed from a plough support vessel, not the

cable lay vessel, to cut the trench in the seabed.

After the trench is cut, the cable lay vessel lays

LAY AND TRENCH V PRE TRE

TRENCHERS

Fig1: Typical Simultaneous

Lay and Burial Operation

Made with Publuu - flipbook maker